NateLogo

flickr1 etsy1 facebook1 pintrest1 twitter1

idesofmarchShort Review: Good directing, believable characters, uninteresting plot. Rent it if you want, but even if you’re a Clooney fan, you can skip it.

Directed by: George Clooney
    Also directed: Good Night and Good Luck (VERY good), Leather Heads (pretty Good).

Main Actors:
    Ryan Gosling: Known for: Crazy, Stupid, Love., Drive (2011), Blue Valentine (2010), Fracture
    George Clooney: Known for being George Clooney, all the Oceans movies, remember Three Kings? Er, From Dusk Till Dawn? or even Return of the Killer Tomatoes!, yeah...
    Philip Seymour Hoffman: known for: Mission: Impossible III , Doubt , Charlie Wilson's War , Before the Devil Knows You're Dead , Capote
    Paul Giamatti: known for: Sideways (2004), The Illusionist (2006), Shoot 'Em Up , Lady in the Water


As I said, the acting is good. Ryan Gosling plays a man who is helping to run a presidential nomination campaign for Clooney’s character, who Gosling feels is the ideal candidate “the one we’ve been waiting for.”  He has all the perfect liberal opinions for the perfect democratic candidate. Only problem is, he’s not winning. Paul Giamatti is running the campaign for another democrat running to get the nomination, and asks to meet Gosling. In the secret meeting, he asks Goslling to ditch his sinking campaign and join his. This sets off a series of unfortunate events and accusations that could ruin the careers of multiple people.

The entire movie and plot is centered around one question, “But at what cost?”  Few people ask themselves when working simply on ambition and glory, but only after consequences to seemingly innocent mistakes lead to horrible affects do we begin to wonder what we might have done differently.

After watching the entire movie, I was left unsatisfied and I didn’t quite understand why at first. After thinking about it a bit more, I felt as though I had just watched a documentary. Which, in and of itself isn’t a bad thing and is probably a tribute to Clooney’s abilities to tell a story. However, I was guess I was just looking for something more shocking, but the movie wasn’t supposed to shock, but to question and make us think about our political system. Which is good, I guess, but I already do...plus...what am I supposed to do about it?

If you like political thrillers, I suppose it’s a good watch, I can see what Clooney wanted to do here, but it was just...kinda...boring in a way.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Google Ad

Latest Articles

  • Painkiller: Part 1 +

    Read More
  • Guardians of the Galaxy: 2 Review +

      I am Groot.   I am Groot, I am Groot!  I am Groot. I am Groot? I am groot. Read More
  • The Accountant +

    Short Review: Does it suck? Nope. Is it awesome? Yep! What’s it like? Rainman + John Wick. No, seriously.   Long Read More
  • Crimson Peak: A beautiful film, not that scary +

    Short Review: Pretty good. Probably don’t need to see it in the theater, but worth a rental. Long review: This Read More
  • The Martian: a hero movie we need +

    Short Review: It’s good, go see it. Long review: In the tradition of Moon, 2001: A Space Odyssey,Gravity and Space Read More
  • Terminator Genisys & Terminator rundown +

      Short Review: Not as bad as everyone says it is. Set your expectations low, and it won’t suck quite Read More
  • Chappie +

    Short Review: It’s very good, go see it. If you’re like my best friend, that’s all you need, stop reading Read More
  • Into the Woods +

    Short Review: Eh, it’s ok. Some good songs, but overall wasn’t that impressed. Long Review: I am not one of Read More
  • A Walk Among the Tombstones +

    Short Review: A classic detective story set way back in in the good old days of 1999. Liam Neeson is Read More
  • Dracula Untold +

    Short Review: It’s fun, but ok, don’t ‘need to see it in the theater. Wait for rental. If you’re a Read More
  • 1
  • 2

Get a Website

therollerskate